Okay, here’s a problem. The purpose of art is not to create financial gain or monetary income; the purpose of art is self expression.
of course it is, but should this mean that the 99% of artists out there have to struggle to get by by working jobs they hate when they could be making economically viable art?
pigcharmer said:
yes, because that way there is more motivation to change this corrupted, redundant system.
robcayman posted this
